Skip to main content

dealing with idiots

there's a difference between the stress that comes from the world, and its inconsistencies, and the stress that comes from our craving to change the world so it fits our agenda


the buddha said the way things are:

—all phenomena is impermanent

—all phenomena is stressful

—all phenomena is without lasting identity


but the stress that comes from craving (as taught in the four noble truths & paticca sammupada) arises from our ignorance, and that's something we can do something about

—the core of wisdom is seeing what we are responsible for, what we can change

—and what we're not responsible for, what we cannot change (not our duty or burden)


This is exemplified in learning how to deal with difficult people:


how to tell if someone is one worthy of respect (sangaha sutta):

—Generosity, compassion, beneficial wisdom, consistency

additional qualities to consider (vassakara sutta):

—someone who helps people

—someone who thinks skillfully and doesn't worry needlessly

—someone who has attained inner peace


those we do not respect:

—greed, anger, superficial and inconstant people

—people who say foolish things, obsess, especially over externals, etc


if worthy of respect

—we review our actions and find the value in their criticisms

—we acknowledge our mistakes

—we focus on resolving the issue

—we refuse to accept any label that is a global putdown

—We listen to understand how do they see the situation


if they're not worthy of respect, we limit our exposure

if we cannot avoid being around them:

—we pause and relax the breath before responding

—we restrain our minds from focusing on them, refocusing on the body

—we limit our statements to "I" statements that communicate our experience rather than "you" focused attacks or accusations

—focus on the positive, praising any positive behaviors they've

—we set boundaries, subjects we will and won't discuss

—if they bring up subjects in our off limits list, we interrupt the action, simply stating we cannot talk presently

—If they continue we withdraw our attention. like we would to a lunatic on the street

—if they ask why we're not engaging we why the behavior is unacceptable to you and specify what you want to change.

—rather than engage, a silent smile can be a skillful way of not joining


the Buddha once refused to respond to a verbally abusive man who came to see him. In frustration the man eventually asked why he did not respond. The Buddha then said, "[I]f someone offers a gift, and you decline it, to whom does it belong?"

—we can refuse the "gift" of insanity, anger, negativity, or abuse that is being offered.


if we obsess when they're not around:

—we may purposely bring about an opposite attitude: aversion to goodwill

—again we treat their words like lunatics on the street, saying hello but not listening

—we can find the stress in the body and release it

—we can find comfortable spots in the body and spread the ease, hang out

—do we want to plant these thoughts for our future minds (neurons that fire, wire)?

—would we say these thoughts to a friend? allow a friend to say to us?

Comments

  1. This was extremely helpful to me... I have to deal with some of these folks over the holidays and I've been a bit stressed over how to best manage my reaction to their behavior. Thank you!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Imagination And Creativity as Spiritual Practice

It’s worth noting how few of childhoods’ freewheeling exercises—the entertainments that were once synonymous with youthful delight—journey through to adult life. To a great degree, we’ve moved, en masse, toward consuming entertainment via television, video games and social media rather than creating our entertainment: drawing, making pottery, dancing, singing, and other inventive endeavors. Those same kindergartners who sing, draw, dance, and engage in all kinds of play, will, in only a few years’ time, be streaming their content via iPad screens, which requires less imagination and effort.  Consider the mind’s two dominant cognitive networks: the first is the default mode network (DMN), a mental state wherein we can visualize possibilities or solve problems, but where we often wind up speculating about unknowable future outcomes or ruminating about interpersonal conflicts. DMN is largely activated by subregions associated with inductive reasoning centers of the brain (t...

Every Day a Reprieve

I woke up sweating, gulping for air. I was in the grips of a panic attack, my stomach cement hard yet churning. In my mind, movie screens played horror films in a loop; the images in this multiplex were darker than Dostoevsky. I’d been sober for six years, but it didn’t matter. My new marriage was surely destined to fail, the small house we’d purchased in Brooklyn destined to crumble. My skills were worthless and would, without doubt, leave me unemployable. Everything about me, an inner verdict announced, was phony and shallow. Friends and family would turn away once my true nature was exposed. I had the feeling that countless eyes were piercing through me and locating something pitiable. I’d awoken into what was eventually diagnosed as “a major depressive episode.” What was the root of it? A childhood spent in a household where rage was routine, violence not unknown. I recall the terror of being awakened from a deep sleep at 4 a.m. and dragged by my ankles into a b...

5 ways to resist obsessive thoughts (Vitakkasanthana)

The mind can be thought of as a committee Our thoughts are present by many "voices," some skillful and unskillful W there are some skillful voices in there, focusing on useful ideas, there are also the many voices in the "committee" that cause us suffering by advancing and encouraging useless, stress inducing ideas, plans, worries. Some examples of unskillful, stress producing obsessions —are dedictated to figuring out the worst possible outcomes (fear) of any situation —fixate on unknowable future events, i.e. what will we experience later in life? —try to figure out what other people are thinking about us —compare ourselves with others, especially in material concerns in general, the buddha broke these down the thoughts of craving, aversion and delusion. How unskillful internal voices persuade us some of these committee members try to get their way by —most work by repeating the same thought over and over —some split into thousands of variations that seem differe...