Skip to main content

not caring what others think

We learn by watching others, seeing what works and doesn't work.

As human beings we have mirror genes that allow us to empathize with the sufferings of others.

Our feelings of safety and security depend on feeling accepted and protected by the tribe; being ostracized cuts deeply, often leaving us feeling alone, insecure, self-doubting.

It can be disconcerting when we are criticized, in relationships, work, families, friends, art.

—sharp, chiding, disparaging words about our reputations security feel threatened.

—there's a tendency to turn disparagements into identity views, to feel trapped

—it can leads to papanca, an inner debate with those who disapprove of us.

—by the end, the mental agitation far outweighs the original reprimand


if we feel there's some validity to the criticism, it's important to:

—dismiss any unskillful elements as the results of stress

—incorporate criticism without adding any identity view

—reminding ourselves that everyone gets criticized

* * * * * * *

The buddha said it is important to discern which people are worth our company and which people should be avoided, so to a certain extent we have to judge others. The buddha's teachings are replete with lists of how to make such distinctions.

alas, most people judge from the skewed values of shallow materialism and warped common sense.

—people criticized anti-war and civil rights activists, calling them anarchists, terrorists, without patriotism

—people criticize from the values of appearance, capital accumulation, fashionability of jobs, etc

—generally, the views that others have of us are not spiritually useful:

In the dhammapada, the buddha taught:

"They will blame you for being silent.

They will blame you when you talk too much, too little or in moderation.

Whatever you do, they will blame you."

"Neither praise nor blame moves the wise man."

—Very, very few people issue verdicts on others from grounded useful, perspectives.


when it comes time to discern the value of others, someone who is :

1) consistent and doesn't abandon,

2) honest, supportive, but capable of steering us in good directions

3) generous, a good listener who is trustworthy

4) balanced in life between material concerns the spiritual

* * * * * * *

as a foundation for life, in the Protection Sutta, rather than being guided by what others think, we should base our actions and take stock based on the precepts and divine:

—people who engage in morally questionable behavior leave themselves vulnerable

—so we live blamelessly, and do not cause harm through violence, speech or sex

—we refrain from intoxication, which results in drama

—we practice humility rather than self-promotion, austerity

—patience with others, cultivating forgiveness in the light or karma

—gratitude, generosity, goodwill


nagara sutta (an 7) the buddha said the mind can be turned into a fortress:

A foundation post that is deeply rooted and cannot be knocked askew: one with conviction in spiritual life will not be tossed about

Dig a moat, deep and wide, to protect those within: One develops shame at unskillfulness, the shame is a moat we cannot cross

Many weapons stored, bows and arrows for protection: One retains the words of wisdom, discussing, thinking about the dhamma, so that we can combat the words of others with higher truths

A large army is stationed within: the noble one's develop persistence in keeping thoughts of reflection on our virtuous actions

a fortress has large stores of food: one feeds on wise thoughts that lead to inner peace (metta)

a fortress has delights: one develops rapture and pleasure and equanimity in one's inner practice

there will be times when we are attacked unfairly. in the pema sutta, the buddha offered the following tools:

—one practices not adding anger to anger or aversion to aversion; we don't accept their words, we view them like repulsive food that other's eat, that we need no part of

—one practices reflecting that absolutely nothing said can ever provide us with an identity; every statement is conditional, arising and passing; we don't develop into "i am" statements, or views of what we may be like in the future

—when the "i am" conceit is abandoned, the root is suffering is destroyed.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

fear

There are times in life when intrusive, fear based thoughts latch hold of us, filling the mind with swarming, buzzing thoughts, distracting us during interactions with others, muting the sensory richness of each moment—the sounds, body sens ations, aromas, feelings and on. Such dire visitors—generally based on past resentments or speculative fears—can easily bait and hook us, threatening us with annihilation, repeating constantly; given how constant the messages can be, releasing such thoughts can feel like ignoring ‘the world is going to end’ new flashes on CNN or city sirens announcing impending hurricanes. The mind can really play tricks that make it all to easy to abandon the present, which is, of course, the only place of true safety and utility. When we find the mind latching onto these narratives, images or moods, and we can’t reassure, reason with or let go, sometimes the only solution is to give up the battle and actually write down what our fears are trying to tell us. If

Imagination And Creativity as Spiritual Practice

It’s worth noting how few of childhoods’ freewheeling exercises—the entertainments that were once synonymous with youthful delight—journey through to adult life. To a great degree, we’ve moved, en masse, toward consuming entertainment via television, video games and social media rather than creating our entertainment: drawing, making pottery, dancing, singing, and other inventive endeavors. Those same kindergartners who sing, draw, dance, and engage in all kinds of play, will, in only a few years’ time, be streaming their content via iPad screens, which requires less imagination and effort.  Consider the mind’s two dominant cognitive networks: the first is the default mode network (DMN), a mental state wherein we can visualize possibilities or solve problems, but where we often wind up speculating about unknowable future outcomes or ruminating about interpersonal conflicts. DMN is largely activated by subregions associated with inductive reasoning centers of the brain (the d

5 ways to resist obsessive thoughts (Vitakkasanthana)

The mind can be thought of as a committee Our thoughts are present by many "voices," some skillful and unskillful W there are some skillful voices in there, focusing on useful ideas, there are also the many voices in the "committee" that cause us suffering by advancing and encouraging useless, stress inducing ideas, plans, worries. Some examples of unskillful, stress producing obsessions —are dedictated to figuring out the worst possible outcomes (fear) of any situation —fixate on unknowable future events, i.e. what will we experience later in life? —try to figure out what other people are thinking about us —compare ourselves with others, especially in material concerns in general, the buddha broke these down the thoughts of craving, aversion and delusion. How unskillful internal voices persuade us some of these committee members try to get their way by —most work by repeating the same thought over and over —some split into thousands of variations that seem differe