Skip to main content

once upon a time

We all like to believe that our memories are accurate, that the inner films and images of our past that bubble up into our awareness are true, and the stories we tell of ourselves are accurate. But what if our autobiographies are actually constructions, that each time we recite our life’s events—to someone else, or in our thoughts—we rewrite each remembrance, forever changing the contents? What if our memories have always been, in essence, fabrications built of the expectations and moods present in each retelling.

Just as it appears that the sun revolves around the earth, it generally seems to those uninformed that the sounds and images of memory are essentially neurally written into the memory centers of the brain after a significant event, and that our recollections are activations of the original cognitions. If a past event seems crisp and clear, in this belief, its because the original encodings have remained essentially unaltered.

Yet despite how real our past appears, significant research by the NYU neuroscience lab, led by Joseph LeDoux, demonstrates that each time we recall a memory it has to be restored, rewritten using protein synthesis (often in the temporal lobe) so it can be recalled in the future. In essence, each time we remember the past we rewrite it, and the underlying mood and beliefs present during each retelling affects how it will be reconsolidated in the brain.

These revelations are of significant import, of course, when it comes to eye-witness testimony, but the implications are even more impressive when we turn to the treatment of traumatic events and subsequent fear. Let’s start by reviewing how fear works: Anxiety and panic result from an associative, unconscious link between a stimuli—aka a “trigger”—and a feeling of vulnerability. Once an event links a trigger with danger, each time we subsequently encounter the trigger, a physiological state of fear will quickly arise, well before conscious awareness. The breath will become short, the blood will start pumping, muscles will tense; the mind will jump to alert, trying to understand our state of unease. For example, should we get into a car accident while listening to Fugazi’s terrific “Waiting Room,” as we hear the track in years to follow, discomfort will arise; we’ll start to panic and want to turn off the track, even though Fugazi didn’t cause the accident. Only the slow process of re-exposing Fugazi to the Amygdala (the region of the brain that makes fear associations) will allow us to eventually listen to the band with some state of ease.

Now, recent research shows that we can weaken the disruptive agitation of conditioned fear responses by focusing on relaxing the body and breath each time a frightening event is consciously recalled. In other words, we can put on “Waiting Room” and breath slowly, extending the exhalations, relaxing the abdomen, keeping in mind the image of someone with whom we feel safe. The process of removing the fear of the song will be significantly sped up. Memories can eventually be held with ease; triggers rendered increasingly neutral.

Finally, to those who might argue that we shouldn’t meddle with memories, its worth noting that we “meddle” with them whether we like it or not; each time we remember anything we’re changing it for good. So why not change our recollections towards that which makes our present lives increasingly tolerable? In other words, parts of our past we run from today might be far more manageable tomorrow.


  1. hello,

    i like your post ! peace of mind over wealth accumulation, and view longer life expectancies as a chance to explore new options and/or pursue old dreams.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

5 ways to resist obsessive thoughts (Vitakkasanthana)

The mind can be thought of as a committee
Our thoughts are present by many "voices," some skillful and unskillful
W there are some skillful voices in there, focusing on useful ideas, there are also the many voices in the "committee" that cause us suffering by advancing and encouraging useless, stress inducing ideas, plans, worries.

Some examples of unskillful, stress producing obsessions
—are dedictated to figuring out the worst possible outcomes (fear) of any situation
—fixate on unknowable future events, i.e. what will we experience later in life?
—try to figure out what other people are thinking about us
—compare ourselves with others, especially in material concerns
in general, the buddha broke these down the thoughts of craving, aversion and delusion.

How unskillful internal voices persuade us
some of these committee members try to get their way by
—most work by repeating the same thought over and over
—some split into thousands of variations that seem different, but are …

The Two Arrows of Suffering

“When hit with discomfort, the conventional reaction is to whine and regret, kick oneself, take it hard. So we feel two afflictions: 1) the inevitable, physical feelings [a first arrow the world blasts us with] and 2) the additional, mental reactions [the second arrow we shoot into ourself]. We may fail to note any relief or escape from uncomfortable feelings [the first arrow] other than to distract ourselves with sensual pleasure. So we cling to diversions, rather than observing what is actually present, the arising and passing of feelings.”
—The Buddha, The Arrow Sutta
This teaching is often summarized as “Pain is inevitable, but suffering is optional.” We have in life two forms of distress in life. The first arises from the unavoidable events that occur in life: the pains, insults, rejections, losses, separations, aging, sickness and on. Such events quickly give rise to inevitable, uncomfortable physical expressions, such as feelings that the wind knocked out of us, a hollowness in …

Buddhism and the Bilateral Brain: A Brief Sketch of Ideas Ranging from the Ancient Greeks, Early Buddhism, Nietzsche and a Smattering of Neuroscience

In Greek mythology, Apollo was the god of the reason and logic, appealing to the ideals of precision and abstract purity. Dionysus was the god of the spontaneous, the emotional, embodied, often irrational instinct. These gods were not considered to be antagonistic but rather complimentary.
Today, from the vantage of contemporary neuropsychology, especially in the works of Iain McGilchrist, Allan Schore and Robert Ornstein, we can readily note how these twin gods neatly represented the asymmetrical brain: • Apollo depicts the perspective of the left hemisphere, which represents the world in static ideas; reality is comprised of separate and fragmented objects, abstracted from their context; reality is separated into parts. The kind of attention is inherently dualistic and isolating—self versus other, me versus you, humankind versus nature; this attention tends to represent the fluid and organic as lifeless, static, in language or symbols. • Dionysus depicts the worldview of the r…